Home / Ski / Skis

Atomic Vantage 95 C Skis

$349.99
$599.95 (42% off)
Atomic Vantage 95 C Skis, , 600
IMAGE ZOOM VIEWER CONTROLS
  • Click to zoom in or click zoom in
  • Double click to zoom out or click zoom out
  • Click reset to reset image
360 SPIN VIEWER CONTROLS
  • Click and drag with rotate to rotate
  • Double click to zoom in or click zoom in
  • Double click to zoom out or click zoom out
  • Click reset to reset
  • Photos
(7)
4.37
|
$349.99
$599.95 (42% off)
Adventure Points Rewards Members earn 350 points with this purchase
Size: Choose One
-
Quantity 
100% Satisfaction guaranteed. Love it or return it. Details
Overview

Best Use: All Mountain skis are for on-trail; some off-trail ability

All Mountain skis are for on-trail; some off-trail ability

Width: Medium - ideal for all-mountain, off-trail versatility

Medium - ideal for all-mountain, off-trail versatility

Flex: Medium - the casual skier with athletic ability

Medium - the casual skier with athletic ability

Rocker Profile: Rocker/Camber/Rocker skis for versatile all-mountain

Rocker/Camber/Rocker skis for versatile all-mountain

 

The Atomic Vantage 95 C is a perfect ski for any intermediate to advanced skier looking for on trail and off trail versatility. The 95mm waist can carve up the frontside with the best of them, while still maintaining a high amount of floatation and off trail power, for anything off piste, but the deepest of powder days. Atomic's Carbon Tank Mesh adds a layer of rigid woven carbon across the ski that increases the overall strength of the ski, without adding any extra weight to the ski. The Vantage 95 has the Light Woodcore that is made from Poplar wood to be very strong, but also very light that adds to the snappiness of the ski. The Vantage 95 also is made with Atomic's Firewall Sidewalls that run the entire length of the ski that have flex groves in them that give you power transmission and edge grip. The All Mountain Rocker Consists of the front 15% of the tip that is rockered, and the rear 10% of the tail has rocker to improve the soft snow skiing ability, and maneuverability, while the middle 75% of the Vantage 95 has camber in increase the edge hold and rebound on the firm stuff. If you are looking for an incredible value ski that skis well for a wide range of skiers, in a wide range of conditions the Atomic Vantage 95 C makes a fine selection.


  • Firewall Sidewalls
  • Carbon Tank Mesh
  • Light Woodcore
  • Recommended Bindings: Atomic Warden 13, Tyrolia Attack 13, Look SPX 12, Marker Griffon
  • Recommended Brake Size:95-110mm


Skill Range: Intermediate-Advanced

 

Specifications
Ski Gear Intended Use  All Mountain What Binding is Included?  None Binding DIN  N/A
Binding Weight Range  N/A Tip/Waist/Tail Widths  133/95/119.5 (@178cm) Tail Profile  Flared
Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length  18.9m (@186cm) Construction Type  Sidewall Core Material  Wood w/ Carbon
Metal Layer  Dual Warranty  One Year Skill Range  Intermediate-Advanced
Model Year  2017 Model Number  AA0025902162 Product ID  399940
Recommended Items
Reviews
4.3

out of 5

download image
5  Star
 3
4  Star
 2
3  Star
 
2  Star
 
1  Star
 
  • 4.3
0%of customers
Recommend this product 0 of7Reviews
 
7Reviews
  • 0.0
  • 0.0
  • 0.0
  • 0.0
Customer Images Page 1 of 1

SORT BY:

 

 
Not the Theory.
2.5

out of 5

2.5
This ski is branded to be the evolution of the Theory. It's a totally different ski. The Theory was much livelier and better off road. The lack of tail rise in the Vantage 95 makes them dull and sticky in bumps. Disappointed.
 
Was this helpful?
42
 
 
 

 
2016 Atomic Vantage 95 C Ski Review by Evan K..
4.0

out of 5

4
Evan here. Just got off the Vantage 95. I give this ski 4 out of 5 stars. It's going to be great for your intermediate to advanced skier just looking to rip all-mountain turns. Definitely more of your frontside but with that waist width it ...Read More
 
Was this helpful?
20
 
 
 

 
2016 Atomic Vantage 95 C Ski Review by Thom.
5.0

out of 5

5
Hi, I'm Thom. I just got off the Atomic Vantage 95. I give this 5 out of 5 stars. Just a super enjoyable ski. It's real target is your kind of mid-intermediate up through high level advanced skier. But the thing just goes into a turn real e...Read More
 
Was this helpful?
10
 
 

SORT BY:

Questions & Answers
Sort By :
Questions
Displaying questions 1-9
 
Q: Hi i would like to know if this skies are good for randonee. Can i put skins on it?
Asked : Sep 23, 2017
By : maria, miami, fl
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A: This ski might be a little heavy (but not a bad choice) for a true randonee set up, even though it feels fairly light on your feet. You can purchase a skin and cut it to the appropriate size. Please copy and paste this link into your browser for something lighter. http://www.skis.com/Atomic-Backland-85-with-Hybrid-Skin-Skis/481288P,default,pd.html
Answered : Sep 25, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: Hi, I'm 5'9" and 170lb and wondering how the Atomic Vantage 95 would go mounted up for telemark? Also, what length ski would you recommend for me for telemark skiing? Regards, Glenn
Asked : Sep 14, 2017
By : Glenn, Australia
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A: I have seen many people mount this ski with a tele set up. The liveliness and sidecut should work very well for dropping a knee. Based on your weight would recommend the 176cm for you.
Answered : Sep 14, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: I'm an advanced intermediate living in Colorado. I ski the Rossignol Experience 84 right now, which I love for front side. I'm looking for something in the 95 range with softer or more rocker in the tip for better performance off trail and in crud etc. Is this a good ski for that?
Asked : Jun 07, 2017
By : Mark, United States
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A: This would make a great ski for you. The Vantage 95 is wide enough and enough rocker to help you get into the powder, but not too demanding to hinder your ability. The E84 and Vantage 95 would be a solid quiver for your ability and location.
Answered : Jun 08, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: I am 63 yrs old, 195 lbs, aggressive intermediate who keeps improving. I ski some blacks but not all. Long skis intimidate me but if I knew what to do for sure I wouldn't ask. Am I OK on the 178s or should I go to the 186s?
Asked : Jan 15, 2017
By : John, Seattle WA
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A: Based on your age, weight and ability the 178cm will be the optimal size for you.
Answered : Jan 16, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: I'm a 6 decade skier, former Utah guy, pow-chaser, racer, still aggressive frontside skier entering my 70's. 70! Never thought I'd make it. Anyway, complicated by some of the travails of time; conditioning, agility, etc. intermixed with limited slope days have regrettably eroded many of the skiing skills I've held dear over the years. Although difficult to accept, the reality is, I'm no longer a "go anywhere" guy on the mountain. I still charge groomers, frontside speed and steep are not an issue (heavy moguls are-due to a knee replacement!). Sadly, powder has become less of an infatuation. Do you think the A-Vantage would provide a good, versatile fit for my projected 80% groomer/20% fluff needs? 6ft/220 still-active lbs. Any alternatives?
Asked : Jan 05, 2017
By : TMc, Paradise, CA
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A: The Vantage ski I would actually lean to for you is the 90CTI. The slightly more narrow waist profile make it easier and faster edge to edge, perfect for groomed and firm snow and the addition of metal adds dampness, calming the ski. However, it is still 90mm underfoot which is wide enough to handle crud and light powder should the mood take you. If you are looking for more of a "true" frontside ski you would want to step into something slightly more narrow underfoot like the Vantage X 83, which is designed to carve fluid, effortless, high speed arcs on groomers.
Answered : Jan 06, 2017
By : Thomas
Q: I'm 5'10", 165 and was wondering if the 170s would be big enough for me since they are the only ones available on the website I'm apart of. I'm an advanced skier.
Asked : Jan 02, 2017
By : Sam, Scarborough Maine
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A: Based on your weight, ability and height the 178cm will be the optimal size for you in the Vantage 95C.
Answered : Jan 03, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: Hi, I'm 25, 5'6" and 148 lb. I normally ride groomers and a bit of powder, and am looking to buy my first all-mountain/frontside skis. Would you recommend this ski over its competitors (like the Experience 88 HD), and if so in what length/bindings?
Asked : Dec 28, 2016
By : Jeff, San Jose, CA
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A: This is a great ski for someone looking to get their first all mountain ski and start exploring more of the mountain. At 95mm under foot you are in that ideal range where the ski can carve effortless turns on hardpacked and groomed snow while still offering a great feel in bumps, crud, and powder. I would not compare this to the Experience 88, as the E88 is much more of an on trail carver that does well as the trails get chewed up throughout the day, where the Vantage 95 C is a ski designed to tackle every condition on the hill. At your height and weight the 162 or 170 would work for you. The 162 will be more nimble and the 170 will be more stable at speed. The Salomon STH2 WTR 13 or Look SPX 12 would be great bindings for these.
Answered : Dec 28, 2016
By : Thomas
Q: Hi, I'm 5'8" and 163lbs. Intermediate/expert 8yrs ago but went to snowboarding. Now 56yo and going back to ski. Plan groom, powder, smaller bumps. What length do you rec? 162? what binding? thinking Marker Griffon ID. BTW, my boots are Atomic Livefit 90. I need real comfortable boots that can not be very tight.... Thank you!
Asked : Nov 27, 2016
By : joe, midwest
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A: Based on your weight and ability I recommend the 170cm for you. The Griffon ID 13, Salomon STH WTR 13, and the Tyrolia Attack 13 all make great bindings for this ski with your weight and skill set. The 100mm brake size will be the best fit.
Answered : Nov 28, 2016
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: I'm about 5 foot 8 and I weigh 125-130 pounds. I'm an advanced intermediate skier, would these be good skis for me? Or would a different pair be better for my skill level?
Asked : Oct 17, 2016
By : mattky, Philadelphia, PA
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A: It is always nice to get a ski a little bit above your current level, so as you progress you will have the right ski. The Vantage 95 is stable without being too demanding for a lightweight skier like yourself. The 162cm would be the best size for your weight and ability.
Answered : Oct 18, 2016
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: hi - i'm 5'8", 148 lbs, intermediate skier that likes to ski groomers and powder. debating between the 162 and 170 length. which would you recommend?
Asked : Aug 27, 2016
By : ace, salt lake city
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A: Based on your weight and ability the 162cm would be the optimal size for you.
Answered : Aug 29, 2016
By : Adam, Midwest
 
You are using a web browser we don't support. Please use the latest version of one of these browsers
 
10% Off Your Order*
For a limited time, sign up for our emails and get 10% off your first purchase. You'll also receive product sneak peeks, exclusive offers, and upcoming events.