Home / Ski / Skis

Atomic Vantage 95 C Skis 2017

$369.95
$599.95 (38% off)
Atomic Vantage 95 C Skis 2017, , 600
IMAGE ZOOM VIEWER CONTROLS
  • Click to zoom in or click zoom in
  • Double click to zoom out or click zoom out
  • Click reset to reset image
360 SPIN VIEWER CONTROLS
  • Click and drag with rotate to rotate
  • Double click to zoom in or click zoom in
  • Double click to zoom out or click zoom out
  • Click reset to reset
  • Photos
(7)
4.37
|
$369.95
$599.95 (38% off)
Adventure Points Rewards Members earn 370 points with this purchase
Size: Choose One
-
Quantity 
100% Satisfaction guaranteed. Love it or return it. Details
Overview

Best Use: All Mountain skis are for on-trail; some off-trail ability

All Mountain skis are for on-trail; some off-trail ability

Width: Medium - ideal for all-mountain, off-trail versatility

Medium - ideal for all-mountain, off-trail versatility

Flex: Medium - the casual skier with athletic ability

Medium - the casual skier with athletic ability

Rocker Profile: Rocker/Camber/Rocker skis for versatile all-mountain

Rocker/Camber/Rocker skis for versatile all-mountain

 

The Atomic Vantage 95 C is a perfect ski for any intermediate to advanced skier looking for on trail and off trail versatility. The 95mm waist can carve up the frontside with the best of them, while still maintaining a high amount of floatation and off trail power, for anything off piste, but the deepest of powder days. Atomic's Carbon Tank Mesh adds a layer of rigid woven carbon across the ski that increases the overall strength of the ski, without adding any extra weight to the ski. The Vantage 95 has the Light Woodcore that is made from Poplar wood to be very strong, but also very light that adds to the snappiness of the ski. The Vantage 95 also is made with Atomic's Firewall Sidewalls that run the entire length of the ski that have flex groves in them that give you power transmission and edge grip. The All Mountain Rocker Consists of the front 15% of the tip that is rockered, and the rear 10% of the tail has rocker to improve the soft snow skiing ability, and maneuverability, while the middle 75% of the Vantage 95 has camber in increase the edge hold and rebound on the firm stuff. If you are looking for an incredible value ski that skis well for a wide range of skiers, in a wide range of conditions the Atomic Vantage 95 C makes a fine selection.


  • Firewall Sidewalls
  • Carbon Tank Mesh
  • Light Woodcore
  • Recommended Bindings: Atomic Warden 13, Tyrolia Attack 13, Look SPX 12, Marker Griffon
  • Recommended Brake Size:95-110mm


Skill Range: Intermediate-Advanced

 

Specifications
Ski Gear Intended Use All Mountain Bindings Included No What Binding is Included? None
Binding DIN N/A Binding Weight Range N/A Tip/Waist/Tail Widths 133/95/119.5 (@178cm)
Tail Profile Flared Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length 18.9m (@186cm) Construction Type Sidewall
Core Material Wood w/ Carbon Used No Metal Layer Dual
Warranty One Year Skill Range Intermediate-Advanced Model Year 2017
Model Number AA0025902162 Product ID 399940   
Recommended Items
Reviews
4.3

out of 5

download image
5  Star
 3
4  Star
 2
3  Star
 
2  Star
 
1  Star
 
  • 4.3
0%of customers
Recommend this product 0 of 7 Reviews
 
7 Reviews
  • 0.0
  • 0.0
  • 0.0
  • 0.0
Customer Images Page 1 of 1

SORT BY:

Maxverts

 

 
Not the Theory.
February 13, 2016
2.5

out of 5

2.5
This ski is branded to be the evolution of the Theory. It's a totally different ski. The Theory was much livelier and better off road. The lack of tail rise in the Vantage 95 makes them dull and sticky in bumps. Disappointed.
 
Was this helpful?
32
 

Adam

 

 
2016 Atomic Vantage 95 C Ski Review by Adam.
October 01, 2015
4.0

out of 5

4
I'm Adam and I was just skiing on the Atomic Vantage 95. I give this ski 4 out of 5 stars. It's very poppy, it's very snappy. I think it makes a great all-mountain ski for that advanced-to-expert skier, especially the lighter weight variety...Read More
 
Was this helpful?
20
 

Ryan

 

 
2016 Atomic Vantage 95 C Ski Review by Ryan.
October 01, 2015
5.0

out of 5

5
Hi, I'm Ryan. I just got off the Atomic Vantage 95. I give this ski 5 out of 5 stars. It's a ski I really, really enjoyed. Very confidence-inspiring at higher speeds. It truly is an all-mountain ski. Works well in the bumps and the trees, o...Read More
 
Was this helpful?
10
 

SORT BY:

Questions & Answers
Sort By :
Questions
Displaying questions 1-9
 
Q: I am 63 yrs old, 195 lbs, aggressive intermediate who keeps improving. I ski some blacks but not all. Long skis intimidate me but if I knew what to do for sure I wouldn't ask. Am I OK on the 178s or should I go to the 186s?
Asked : Jan 15, 2017
By : John, Seattle WA
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:Based on your age, weight and ability the 178cm will be the optimal size for you.
Answered : Jan 16, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: I'm a 6 decade skier, former Utah guy, pow-chaser, racer, still aggressive frontside skier entering my 70's. 70! Never thought I'd make it. Anyway, complicated by some of the travails of time; conditioning, agility, etc. intermixed with limited slope days have regrettably eroded many of the skiing skills I've held dear over the years. Although difficult to accept, the reality is, I'm no longer a "go anywhere" guy on the mountain. I still charge groomers, frontside speed and steep are not an issue (heavy moguls are-due to a knee replacement!). Sadly, powder has become less of an infatuation. Do you think the A-Vantage would provide a good, versatile fit for my projected 80% groomer/20% fluff needs? 6ft/220 still-active lbs. Any alternatives?
Asked : Jan 05, 2017
By : TMc, Paradise, CA
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:The Vantage ski I would actually lean to for you is the 90CTI. The slightly more narrow waist profile make it easier and faster edge to edge, perfect for groomed and firm snow and the addition of metal adds dampness, calming the ski. However, it is still 90mm underfoot which is wide enough to handle crud and light powder should the mood take you. If you are looking for more of a "true" frontside ski you would want to step into something slightly more narrow underfoot like the Vantage X 83, which is designed to carve fluid, effortless, high speed arcs on groomers.
Answered : Jan 06, 2017
By : Thom
Q: I'm 5'10", 165 and was wondering if the 170s would be big enough for me since they are the only ones available on the website I'm apart of. I'm an advanced skier.
Asked : Jan 02, 2017
By : Sam, Scarborough Maine
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:Based on your weight, ability and height the 178cm will be the optimal size for you in the Vantage 95C.
Answered : Jan 03, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: Hi, I'm 25, 5'6" and 148 lb. I normally ride groomers and a bit of powder, and am looking to buy my first all-mountain/frontside skis. Would you recommend this ski over its competitors (like the Experience 88 HD), and if so in what length/bindings?
Asked : Dec 28, 2016
By : Jeff, San Jose, CA
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:This is a great ski for someone looking to get their first all mountain ski and start exploring more of the mountain. At 95mm under foot you are in that ideal range where the ski can carve effortless turns on hardpacked and groomed snow while still offering a great feel in bumps, crud, and powder. I would not compare this to the Experience 88, as the E88 is much more of an on trail carver that does well as the trails get chewed up throughout the day, where the Vantage 95 C is a ski designed to tackle every condition on the hill. At your height and weight the 162 or 170 would work for you. The 162 will be more nimble and the 170 will be more stable at speed. The Salomon STH2 WTR 13 or Look SPX 12 would be great bindings for these.
Answered : Dec 28, 2016
By : Thom
Q: Hi, I'm 5'8" and 163lbs. Intermediate/expert 8yrs ago but went to snowboarding. Now 56yo and going back to ski. Plan groom, powder, smaller bumps. What length do you rec? 162? what binding? thinking Marker Griffon ID. BTW, my boots are Atomic Livefit 90. I need real comfortable boots that can not be very tight.... Thank you!
Asked : Nov 27, 2016
By : joe, midwest
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:Based on your weight and ability I recommend the 170cm for you. The Griffon ID 13, Salomon STH WTR 13, and the Tyrolia Attack 13 all make great bindings for this ski with your weight and skill set. The 100mm brake size will be the best fit.
Answered : Nov 28, 2016
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: I'm about 5 foot 8 and I weigh 125-130 pounds. I'm an advanced intermediate skier, would these be good skis for me? Or would a different pair be better for my skill level?
Asked : Oct 17, 2016
By : mattky, Philadelphia, PA
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:It is always nice to get a ski a little bit above your current level, so as you progress you will have the right ski. The Vantage 95 is stable without being too demanding for a lightweight skier like yourself. The 162cm would be the best size for your weight and ability.
Answered : Oct 18, 2016
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: hi - i'm 5'8", 148 lbs, intermediate skier that likes to ski groomers and powder. debating between the 162 and 170 length. which would you recommend?
Asked : Aug 27, 2016
By : ace, salt lake city
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:Based on your weight and ability the 162cm would be the optimal size for you.
Answered : Aug 29, 2016
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: Hey. Im 6 foot 4 (195 cm) and weigh 190 lbs (87 kg). Intermediate skier. What length would you recommend for these? 195 -15 = 180. I was thinking about the 179 cm, wasnt sure if the 187 is too long?
Asked : Aug 22, 2016
By : Paul, New York
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:Based on your weight and skill level I would recommend the 179cm.
Answered : Aug 24, 2016
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: OK, now that I bought a pair of Atomic Vantage 95 C size 178cm's, what would be a good safe binding for it. I'm 5'10 180 lbs 59 yrs old, medium aggressive, my din is 6 on my Dynastars cham 87's and that seems to work good. Since its a light ski should I go with a lighter binding? Thanks for the help, Garman
Asked : Jun 22, 2016
By : Garman, Gresham Oregon
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:The Salomon/Atomic Warden MNC 13 would be my first choice for you. It offers up a strong amount of energy transfer, with solid retention, and consistant release values. The 100mm brake size would be the perfect fit. We have some avaialble here at the moment. Please copy and paste this link into your browser. http://www.skis.com/Salomon-Warden-MNC-13-Ski-Bindings/397549P,default,pd.html
Answered : Jun 23, 2016
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: What about size, do they ski short or long? I'm 59, 5'10 180 lbs, advanced intermediate, like to ski groomers and all mountain. Skiing 172cm dynastar cham 87's. Thinking the 178cm's would work, the 170's might be to short. What say you?
Asked : Jun 18, 2016
By : Garman, Gresham Oregon
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:The Vantage 95 skis slightly short due to the amount of rocker in the tip and tail. Based on your weight, I would encourage you to ski the 178cm.
Answered : Jun 20, 2016
By : Adam, Midwest
 
You are using a web browser we don't support. Please use the latest version of one of these browsers
 
Don’t Miss Out!
Get exclusive email sneak peeks and the latest on upcoming sales, exclusive offers and events. Plus we’ll throw in a special perk, just for signing up.*