skis
Login | Register | Customer Service 1-800-SKIS.COM
(800-754-7266)

Size Chart | Skis

October 21st, 2009

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ,

196 Responses to “Size Chart | Skis”

  1. lkiebler Luke says:

    Susanne- Based on all the information you submitted to us, I would suggest considering the K2 T:Nine Lotta Luv Women’s Skis with the M1 11.0 bindings. These mid-fat skis offer a 78mm waist and a 15m turning radius perfect laying down some nice turns whether you are out west, or out east. The 78mm waist will offer a nice, stable platform that is wide enough to handle any expected, or unexpected powder on those steeper runs. Incorporating the MOD technology for vibration dampening, these skis will take on the hard pack and icy conditions providing you a smoother ride as you arc your turns. You may also consider the K2 T:Nine Tough Luv if you’re looking for a little wider ski for exploring more of the mountain in more off trail conditions. The Dynastar Exclusive Fluid skis will be better suited for making shorter, quicker turns on trail. I hope this help in your decision making.

  2. lkiebler Luke says:

    Linda- You made an excellent twin tip selection with the Rossignol Trixie. This will be a versatile twin tip that your daughter can take in the park, or all over the mountain with confidence. This ski has an 80mm waist, which means you would need a wide brake binding that has brake width of 80mm or slightly greater. I would suggest looking at the Salomon Z10 bindings 2010. I will include a link to the bindings below.

    http://www.skis.com/wide-brake-bindings/c1000000018/salomon-z10-bindings-2010-p164442.html

  3. Kevin Kevin Palmer says:

    Linda,

    This is a tough one as you are basically asking for a twin tip race ski. Lets see what we can do. The best compromise for what you are looking to do would be either the Line Prophet 90 or the Volkl Bridge. They are both around 90mm at the waist with good side cuts so they will be versatile in a variety of condition and turn well on the hard packed. Neither will be awesome in the skier cross coarse but will be good for twins (most skiers who are really into skier cross actually ski on GS skis, but these won’t work in the park or as all-mountain skis). The Volkls will edge out the Lines in edge grip and stability at very high speeds. The Lines get the go ahead in ease of turn initiation and forgiveness.

    Kevin

  4. lkiebler Luke says:

    Lake- For an individual of your size, I would not advise going with the 170cm ski length. This will be a very fast ski and will take more effort to carve. I would recommend searching for ski around 145-150cm in length. When you have a minute, take a look at the link below. This is for the K2 T:9 Tough Luv. This ski is going to be a little wider and a more appropriate size for you. It will still offer that all mountain, all condition ski type that you are looking for.

    http://sale.skis.com/womens-skis-w-integrated-bindings/c738/k2-t%253a9-tough-luv-womens-skis-with-m1-110-ti-demo-bindings-2009-p178539.html

  5. pam pam says:

    i am 180 lb 5′6″ a beginner to intermediate skier. I like to cruise, some speed is okay . I like to try all the slopes but maintain my speed on the diamonds because I’m new to this. What size sky do I need and would the shorty’s work for me?

  6. Bonnie Bonnie says:

    I already own a pair of Burnin’ Luv and a pair of Phat Luv skis. Both are 168cm length. I ski exclusively out west and find the Burnin’ Luvs heavy and too skinny in the waist in ungroomed terrain although they carve well on groomers and hold well on ice. I am 5′5″ tall 60 years old and weigh 150 pounds. What ski would you recommend for an every day do anything ski for me? I’ve been told to shorten my ski length and would like to know what length you would recommend? I enjoy the Phat Luvs when there is about 8″ of powder. I’ve been skiing for over 30 years and ski approximately 40-80 days per year.

  7. Kyle Kyle says:

    I’m 5′11 155lbs. I’m looking to get a good twin tip ski for all mountain. I like bumps but i’m not much of a park guy. I like going fast on blues and greens typically go about as fast as i can on those but I want to be able to stay under control on blacks and doubles. I want a ski that will help me progress as a skier. I typically only go for a few days a year since I live in Missouri but i’m looking to start going more. Any Suggestions?

    Kyle

  8. best eastern groomer ski best eastern groomer ski says:

    I am an advanced skier who ski’s mostly in east. I am 6′2″ 200 lbs. when out west ski volkl grizz. I am seeking fast, quick turning ski for steep eastern crud and groomed pow.looking at Nordica line, jet fuels, hot rods. Narrow wastes. Any suggestions for 09 ski’s sold w/ bindings?
    michael

  9. John John says:

    I’m an experiened intermediate skier ,sking mostly groomed,firm surfaces (New England)I am in my late 70s I ski moderate speeds weigh 150lbs I ski on k2 3.5 168s .

    My wife skis about the same is also150lbs.We both ski a t moderate speeds.She skis on K2 3.5 158s

  10. tanner tanner says:

    this sucks what if your 110 pounds and 6 ft tall

  11. cheng cheng says:

    Hi,

    I’m a beginner. 5′4″ tall, 175 lbs. Is the 163cm skis too long for me?

  12. aschaa01 Andrew Schaad says:

    Cheng,

    I would say yes, a 163cm ski is going to be a bit too long for you. Your weight puts you at 160, right on the cusp of 165. however, your height and your skill level push the height of the ski down a bit. I’d put you around a 155 or 158cm, likely no more than a 160cm.

  13. aschaa01 Andrew Schaad says:

    Tanner,

    I apologize that you’re having difficulty with the sizing chart. However, your weight puts you at a staring ski length of 145cm. I’d probably add an additional 5 to 8cm for your height putting you around a 150-153cm. You didn’t list your skiing ability so you’d have to subtract 5 if you’re a beginner or add 5 if you’re an advanced skier (10cm if you’re an expert level) and then also add 5 if you want an all-mountain ski (10 if you want big mountain/powder skis).

    If you get me your skill level and type of ski you’re interested in I can better assist you.

  14. Phil Phil says:

    Hi there,

    My wife is (4″10″ 110 lbs) and I is (5′3″ 140 lbs.) and my son is 12 years old (4′11″ 110 lbs.) we are all ski beginners and would like to know what’s the right gear we need in regards with buying right size of skis base on our heights and weights and ski level. All recommendation is greatly appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Phil

  15. Karen Karen says:

    Hi
    It’s been 17 years since I skied. I have recently gone with my kids and it was like riding a bike it came right back. I am interested in buying a pair of skis. I am 5 7″ and 155 pounds I was sking intermediate comfortably. I want something affordable. What would you recommend?
    Thanks

  16. Andy Andy says:

    Hi
    Looking to replace my Rosi’s - Super Cross Cut 9.9 184cm and am hoping you can offer a recommendation.
    I am 5′10″ 190lb and consider myself to be an advanced intermediate skiier.
    I stick to the groomers for the most part and like to ski fast while maintaing absolute control.
    I think my current skiis are a bit long. While fast, they dont feel all that stable at high speeds.
    Thoughts?
    Thanks!

  17. chris chris says:

    Hi!
    My son is 4.5 years old and 45in. tall. He’s a beginner. What size would you recommend?

  18. Lee Lee says:

    Hi,

    I would like your opinion on sizing. I have looked at your chart and I just want another opinion. I have skied off and on for the last 30 years, but never enough in one season to get really good. I would say I am an advanced intermediate, meaning knee deep powder, and moguled out extremely steep runs are still a bit intimidating. I presently ski on 190 cm. dinosaur Dynastar’s I bought in 1994. I ski mainly groomed runs, but occasionally go out in the trees or attack moguls. I can’t remember the last time I have biffed it really bad on a groomed trail even though I like to go pretty fast. I am ready to upgrade to shape skis, though I have never skied on them before. I am looking at your Dynastar Legend Sultan 80 Skis with NX 12 Lifter Medium Bindings 2010 @ 165 cm. I am 5′ 11″ 145 lbs. Your opinion on all aspects of my purchase is appreciated even if you recommend something else, although price does matter. Thanks.

  19. Louisa Louisa says:

    Hi - I’m an advanced skier, doing blacks comfortably and double blacks without bumps, ski mostly in the east on ice but going to Colorodo end of March this year. Do you think the Burnin Luvs are for me? I’m 5′ 6″ and 132 lbs. 156 or 160 ? Thanks.

  20. becky becky says:

    Hi I am looking to buy skis and would like some advice.. I am 5′10″ about 150 lbs female skiier. I would consider myself intermediate +…. I like to do all different downhill trails… cruisers, glades, easy and hard trails. I was thinking about the k2 tough luv in 163 cm.

    do you think this would be a good fit for me??

    any advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks!

  21. aschaa01 Andrew Schaad says:

    Becky,
    The Tough Luv is an option for you, but it wouldn’t be my number one recommendation for you, simply because it might be too much ski for you if you’re intermediate-to-advanced-intermediate. However, if you’re more towards an advanced-intermediate-to-advanced who is looking to progress, the Tough Luv could work well to get you to the next level.
    If you’re more towards the skill level I first mentioned, the Rossignol Attraxion III or the Attraxion VI are good options. The Attraxion VI will get you through the advanced level, on up to expert level. It is a bit wider than the Attraxion III in both the waist and the tip and tail. If you stick primarily to the groomed trails, the Attraxion III would be best. If you venture off a bit, or would like the option to, the Attraxion VI would be better for that.
    The K2 Tough Luv, if you’re really interested in it will give you everything and more. It’s wide under the foot at 88mm, so edge to edge won’t be as fast as the smaller waisted skis, but it will work well in the soft snow, crud, and small amounts of powder. I guess you’d just want to ask yourself if you’re capable of handling a ski that’s 88 under the foot as opposed to something smaller like 72 or 74.
    The size recommendation I’d give you is 162-165cm.

  22. aschaa01 Andrew Schaad says:

    Louisa,

    Based on your skill level and weight, I would put you in at least a 160. Your weight warrants a 155cm, but your skill level and terrain type warrant a bit more so a 160-163, maybe 165 would work for you. As far as the K2 Burnin’ Luv skis go, they are a great option for you. However, I think a better option for you might be the K2 Free Luv in a 163cm. This ski is wider in the foot than the Burnin Luv, 76mm compared to 70mm. Thus it will give you better float in the western terrain, but still offer everything you need for eastern terrain skiing. It suits your skill level and the 163 will work for your weight and skill set. However, if you’re more comfortable with the Burnin’ Luv, I’d go with the 160cm.

  23. aschaa01 Andrew Schaad says:

    Lee,

    I’m not sure what you need our opinion for, it sounds like you know exactly what you need. The Dynastar Legend Sultan 80 is going to be ideal for everything you want to do. Since you spend most of your time on groomed trails, the Sultan 80 is going to allow you to go edge-to-edge very quickly and smoothly. Also, since you’re moving over to shaped skis, the 80mm footprint at the waist won’t be too much for you. At the same time, it will give you all the support you need for those times you want to venture to the trees or moguls. The Sultan 80’s sidewall construction is going to make it super stable for you when you hit those high speeds that you enjoy too. All in all, I think for the terrain, the skills, and your weight, the 165 is ideal for you. Let me know if you have any other questions.

  24. John Brown John Brown says:

    Hi I am 6 feet 2 and weigh 190 pounds. I ski mostly groomed pistes and am an intermediate skier.I am looking to buy new skis.What size would you recommend?Thanks.

  25. aschaa01 Andrew Schaad says:

    Chris,

    I would recommend a length around 100cm for him. For kids who are just beginning, skier weight isn’t as important as it is for adults. A ski around the 100cm mark should get him on the slopes and allow him to get the hang of stopping and learning to turn. Once he gets better and older, you’ll want to account for his weight since he’ll be applying more pressure on the ski and carving his turns rather than simply sliding them.

    A good option for him might be the Alpina Zoom. This ski is sold flat (no integrated bindings), so I’d go with something like the Salomon 305 or the Salomon TZ5.

  26. aschaa01 Andrew Schaad says:

    John,

    Based on your weight and skill level, I’d put you in a ski length around 165-170cm. If you’re looking all-mountain, probably lean towards the 170cm end. Happy skiing!

  27. aschaa01 Andrew Schaad says:

    Karen,

    First off, I’m glad to hear you’re back in the sport, you’re going to have more fun than you’ve ever had before. As for skis, I would put you in a ski sized 160-165cm. My recommendations based on your appropriate ski length and skill level would be the Rossignol Pasion III in a 162cm or the Rossignol Attraxion III in a 162cm. The 2009 models will work great for you and they’re super affordable.

    Welcome back to skiing. Be safe and have FUN!

  28. Art Art says:

    Hi there - I’m considering the Scott Punisher twin tips but thrown off by the size. I mistakenly purchase the 174 Salomon Foil 1080s and they’re way too short for me…too much energy just trying to control them at higher speeds on groomers and back country. I’m 6′0 205 lbs and very aggressive skiier. I like skiing trees and also groomers, etc. I was wondering your thoughts on the 191 or the next size down on these. Thinking 191 is too big but don’t want to be too small again! Thanks very much in advance.

  29. bette bette says:

    Just got my 8 yr old to like skiing. Should I go with new or used skis? He is 4′7″ and 100 lbs. Not an aggressive kid, very content with the lower slopes. Thanks for your help.

  30. aschaa01 Andrew Schaad says:

    Phil,

    Based on the information you provided, I’d suggest the following ski lengths:

    For your wife, I’d put here in a ski length no more than a 145cm, probably sticking close to 140-142cm since she’s a beginner. Good options for her would be the K2 First Luv (142cm) or the Dynastar Exclusive Sensation (143cm).

    For your son, I would suggest a ski length around the same. No more than a 145cm. This would put him on the very end of the kids’ skis range, so you may be better off renting the remainder of this season if you plan on going and investing in a men’s ski next season as he is likely to add some height and weight by next winter.

    Finally, for you, I’d suggest a ski in the 150-155cm range. The Salomon X-Wing 4 (154cm) would be a good option. You could also consider the Volkl Unlimited AC3 Motion (156cm), but it would be my number 1 recommendation for you since it’s a tad on the large size for your skill level right now and it might be a little on the advanced side for you right now. On the flip side, it would be a great ski as your skills progress. It is just a matter of preference for you on whether you feel you could handle the extra length.

    Hope this answered your questions and I’m glad to hear you’re making skiing a family affair, that’s always fun!

  31. aschaa01 Andrew Schaad says:

    Based on what you’ve outlined in terms of weight and skill level I’d recommend a length between 175 and 180cm, probably a bit more towards the 180 range since you’re used to a larger ski at 184cm. A good option for you would be the Rossignol Avenger 82 Carbon, this would work for you in either a 177 or 182cm. This ski however is going to be wide at the waist (82mm). If you’re a dominant groomed run guy, it might be a bit wide for your liking, but you’d know that better than I would. For a slimmer waisted option, a great choice, and probably my top recommendation for you would be the Salomon X-Wing Storm (176cm). It’s 74mm at the waist so it will be quick from edge to edge and has a 120mm tip to power through crud and softer snow.

    Enjoy!

  32. cgorski Chris Gorski says:

    Pam,

    With the stats given you would be in a standard ski size of roughly 158-160 cm and a pole size of 46 inches. This size is for a beginner/intermediate skier skiing all mountain. When you refer to “shorty’s” I believe you are referring to ski blades which will work universally for all adults and take standard ski boots. The ski blades offer a ton of control due to their short size but can be very slow and lose their appeal faster than a standard set of skis. Hopefully this answers your question and we will be glad to answer anymore you have.

    Thanks,

    Chris Gorski

  33. cgorski Chris Gorski says:

    Bette,
    When thinking of buying new or used skis there are a few things to take into account as your making your decision. With used skis you are going to want to know how old the skis are. If the skis are more than 4-5 years old they are most likely toward the end of their skiing life. The skis could have been abused by the skier or stored improperly. The used skis we offer are only 1 season old and are inspected before shipped, making them safe. At $99.99 you can add a boot and get away with a package roughly between $160-170 and be ready to go.

    Now there are obvious upsides to buying brand new as opposed to used. With a new ski it is fresh off the presses and ready to be used and learned on by your little skier. You will know where that ski has been and know it is 100% perfect condition. With new ski packages under $200 you can get into brand new equipment for close to the same as used.

    Whichever you choose we can help you also with the sizing, the size recommended for your child’s weight, height, age and skier ability would be in the range of 130-134. Hopefully this information helps in your decision and please let us know if you need any further assistance.

    Thanks,

    Chris Gorski

  34. Allen W Allen W says:

    Hi….I am 5′8″ 230 lbs….I rented the Rossignol Z10 in 154…fun to ski on…but told I should get a 170 or 176 lengh. I ski every week mainly on the grooms…but if it is a powder day …I am still going to ski…any suggestions on which length to get. I usually ski in control on the grooms….but will go faster when chasing my ski buddy.

  35. cgorski Chris Gorski says:

    Bonnie,
    You are right in guessing that you should shorten your ski length. For an everyday all mountain carver that will give you fun on the groomers you should be looking for something in or around the 157-159 size range. You are in the 168 size range for powder skis but you are looking for something more universal it sounds like.

    The Salomon Origins Opal in a 160 length could be what you are looking for. It has a narrower waist giving it the ability to take fast carves and rip at high speeds. At 120/78/102 you will still be able to take the occasional powder run but still have the ability to tackle the groomers with no issue. Check out the video reviews on this ski for more insight.

    Another similar ski would be the Volkl Attiva Estrella. At 124/73/94 you can still rock the un-groomed but have that extra acceleration and great turning radius on the corduroy groomers. This Volkl is lightweight and offers poppy response for all around use.

    Hope this helps in your decision! Let us know if you have any further questions or concerns.

    Thanks,

    Chris Gorski

  36. cgorski Chris Gorski says:

    Allen,

    Given your measurements and style of skiing we are sizing you between 165-170 cm in an all mountain ski. This size ski will give you ample control and speed on the groomers but still be able to take on some more challenging terrain when you choose to go that way with your skiing. We hope that this helps. No more 154’s! :)

    Thanks,

    Chris Gorski

  37. Ivan Ivan says:

    I’m a pretty big guy (6′1″ and 265) and was trying to figure out how long to go. I ski blues and double blues. Going skiing in early April, so high chance of cruddy conditions. Thx

  38. Angela Angela says:

    I’m new to skiing and although I’m not good, I really like it. I stick to the beginners slopes. I have been renting skiis but am ready to purchase. Im 5′4″ and 152 lbs. I would like an affordable package but am unsure of the sizing and the type of skiis to purchase.
    Thanks.

  39. cgorski Chris Gorski says:

    Ivan,

    Given your size and the type of runs you will be skiing we would confidently size you in the size range of 172-176 in an all mountain ski. This size ski will work for you in most all conditions.

    Please let us know if you have any further questions.

    Thanks,

    Chris Gorski

  40. cgorski Chris Gorski says:

    Angela,

    We can begin with the proper size ski that will help you in your skiing. We have you measuring in between the sizes of 150-154 in a women’s ski. This number is calculated by your height, weight and skier ability. Your ski pole size would be roughly 44 inches.

    For skis you will want something easier flexing and not aggressive as you are still learning and will be progressing with the ski. Some recommendations are below.

    The Roxy Juicy is an easy to ski lightweight ski that will make it easier for you to learn. This specific ski actually has a silhouette cut into the tail of the ski to aid in carving of turns. Ski this in the 154 size and you will be good to go. Check out the video review of the ski by clicking the banner on the page, real skiers who have skied it review it.

    The Salomon Origins Amber is going to be a little bit stiffer than the above Roxy but it will not be so much so that it will make your skiing any more difficult. This ski may be a bit better if you plan on skiing more and want a ski with the ability of more growth. You can also ski this in the 154.

    The Dynastar Exclusive Sensation is very similar to the above Salomon where it will be a bit stiffer than the top Roxy ski but can definitely be skied by you in your current situation and is capable of growth as you ski more often and more demanding terrain.

    Please let us know if you have any further questions or comments.

    Thanks,

    Chris Gorski

  41. Kevin Kevin Palmer says:

    Art,
    The size really depends on your intended use for the ski. If you are planning on using it as a powder/all-mountain ski and like to go FAST, then the 191 would be appropriate. If you are going to use it more as an all-mountain/park ski then I would drop down to the 182. Either size will be much more stable than the 1080s and will have more edge grip.

    Thanks,

    Kevin Palmer

  42. cgorski Chris Gorski says:

    Kyle,

    Exciting to hear you’re committing yourself to skiing more! When sizing for a twin tip you want to size up just a bit and for your stats we’ll be putting you in a 165-170cm twin tip ski. We have a couple models that fit into that size category but really only a few that fit the bill for what you are looking for. The K2 Extreme and the Dynastar 6th Sense are both fantastic all mountain twins that will help you progress your skiing all while having a fun time.

    The K2 Extreme has a lively flex and poppy wood core that will help you carve under control. Being 85mm under the waist you can ski many differing conditions with ease, whether it’s groomers, crud or the occasional powder stash. Take this in a 169 and rip!

    A very similar ski to the above K2 is the Dynastar 6th Sense Distorter twin tip ski. At 87mm under foot, this ski is a bit wider but still maintains the shape of an all mountain twin. With full sidewalls and a poppy wood core, control will be mixed with liveliness and speed. Ski the 167 and have fun!

    Hope this helps, let us know if you have any further questions.

    Thanks,

    Chris Gorski

  43. cgorski Chris Gorski says:

    Michael,

    We unfortunately do not carry the Nordica line but I can make some great suggestions from what we do carry. You can still keep a narrower waist ski and have dimensions capable of skiing the steep eastern crud and groomed powder.

    The Rossignol Avenger 82 Carbon ski with dimensions of 128/82/112 and a turn radius of 17.8m (@177) will take on anything you can throw at it. You could easily ski this in the 170 length.

    Another great ski with similar dimensions would be the K2 Apache Xplorer. At 128/84/112 and 17m turn radius (at 177cm). An all mountain ski which features a metal laminate over a wood core makes this ski extremely versatile for soft and hard conditions.

    Please take some time to watch the video reviews on this skis as it will explain in more detail the specifics on each ski. Let us know if you have any further questions.

    Thanks,

    Chris Gorski

  44. Emre Emre says:

    Hi i am 15 years old and 132 pound 6 feet ı am advanced skier.I bought rossignol s3 (2009) pommier 170 cm skis .I want to ride in park and off piste.Are this skis good for me? which size chart is good for my skis? When i take a best performance ?

  45. cgorski Chris Gorski says:

    Emre,

    Given your size and skiing type those skis will be a bit big for you currently, but not so much that it will be an issue. At 15 you will most likely still be adding some weight, roughly 10 pounds will get you fitting perfect into those skis. The S3 is a sick ski that you will definitely love growing into, for what kind of riding you state you will be doing we believe you made a great choice.

    Let us know if you have any further questions or concerns.

    Thanks,

    Chris Gorski

  46. Emre Emre says:

    Thank you for answer Chris :) Now i am very happy about this answer.

Leave a Reply