Home / Ski / Skis

Salomon QST Lux 92 Womens Skis 2017

$499.95
$600.00 (17% off)
Salomon QST Lux 92 Womens Skis 2017, , 600
IMAGE ZOOM VIEWER CONTROLS
  • Click to zoom in or click zoom in
  • Double click to zoom out or click zoom out
  • Click reset to reset image
360 SPIN VIEWER CONTROLS
  • Click and drag with rotate to rotate
  • Double click to zoom in or click zoom in
  • Double click to zoom out or click zoom out
  • Click reset to reset
  • Photos
(5)
4.65
|
$499.95
$600.00 (17% off)
Adventure Points Rewards Members earn 500 points with this purchase
Size: Choose One
-
Quantity 
100% Satisfaction guaranteed. Love it or return it. Details
Overview

Best Use: All Mountain skis are for on-trail; some off-trail ability

All Mountain skis are for on-trail; some off-trail ability

Width: Medium - ideal for all-mountain, off-trail versatility

Medium - ideal for all-mountain, off-trail versatility

Flex: Stiff - advanced to experts who want power and control

Stiff - advanced to experts who want power and control

Rocker Profile: Rocker/Camber/Rocker skis for versatile all-mountain

Rocker/Camber/Rocker skis for versatile all-mountain

 

The new Salomon QST Lux 92 makes an excellent ski for a wide range of skiers looking for versatility. Salomon's new CFX Superfiber technology works with a Spaceframe Wood Core to be stable and strong without adding any extra weight to the ski, it actually makes the Lux lighter. Salomon's Power Transfer Platform has a stronger construction in the center of the ski that keeps it rigid underfoot for extra edge hold and responsiveness while the tips and tails are softer for a higher energy transfer and more efficient skiing. A Koroyd Tip reduces tip chatter and increases maneuverability by pulling heavier material away from the tip of the ski for a lower swingweight. If you are looking for a very well rounded ski that can take you off the groomers, while still being fantastic in any condition, the Salomon QST Lux 92 is the ski for you.


  • Spaceframe Woodcore
  • CFX Superfiber
  • Koroyd Tip
  • Hook Free Taper
  • Power Transfer Platform
  • All-Terrain Rocker 2.0
  • 1560g/Per Ski (@161cm)
  • Recommended Bindings: Salomon Warden 13, Salomon STH2 WTR 13, Marker Griffon, Tyrolia Attack 13, Look SPX 12
  • Recommended Brake Size: 95-110mm


Skill Range: Intermediate-Advanced

 

Specifications
Ski Gear Intended Use All Mountain Bindings Included No Tip/Waist/Tail Widths 129/92/112 (@169cm)
Tail Profile Flared Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length 16.2m (@169cm) Construction Type Sidewall
Core Material Wood Used No Metal Layer None
Warranty One Year Skill Range Intermediate-Advanced Model Year 2017
Model Number L39144500153 Product ID 446428   
Recommended Items
Reviews
4.6

out of 5

download image
5  Star
 3
4  Star
 
3  Star
 
2  Star
 
1  Star
 
  • 4.6
20%of customers
Recommend this product 1 of 5 Reviews
 
5 Reviews
  • 0.0
  • 0.0
  • 0.0
  • 0.0
Customer Images Page 1 of 1

SORT BY:

Carol

 

 
Best Skiis I have ever experienced!.
February 01, 2017
5.0

out of 5

5
I have been skiing for 50 years, Yes, 50 years. 64 years old and 127 lbs. I was even on my High School Ski Team. I have been using a pair of Vokl parabolic skis for the last several years that I did not feel stable on. I felt like the fr...Read More
 
Was this helpful?
20
 

Brigitte

 

 
November 21, 2016
4.5

out of 5

4.5
Hi I'm Brigitte, and I just got off the Salomon Lux QST 92's. I give this ski a 4.5 out of 5. First of all navy is the new black. It looks really sharp and it skis sharp too. It gave me a lot of control and I felt like it turned really well...Read More
 
Was this helpful?
00
 

Julie

 

 
November 21, 2016
5.0

out of 5

5
Hi I'm Julie, I just got off the Salomon Lux 92. I give this ski a 5 out of 5 star rating. I thought it was an excellent ski for somebody that is looking for a very versatile all-mountain ski that is light and lively. At 92 under the foot i...Read More
 
Was this helpful?
10
 

SORT BY:

Questions & Answers
Sort By :
Questions
Displaying questions 1-9
 
Q: Hi, I am 5'3", 115 pounds. I am an advanced intermediate skier just starting to ski a little powder. I demoed the 161cm and felt great in them, but I noticed that you recommended the 153 cm to most women in my spec range. Do you think I'm ok to stay in the 161?
Asked : Mar 02, 2017
By : Nancy, Utah
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:Based on your weight and ability I would recommend the 153cm for you as well. You may find the floatation great in the 161cm, but may be a little fatiguing for a long ski day. If you like how they ride and do not get overly tired, stick with them.
Answered : Mar 06, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: Hello, I have Salomon lux 92 skis and Lange xc 80 w boots, starting to actively ride on blue trails - what would be your recommendation for appropriate bindings ?
Asked : Feb 28, 2017
By : Juniorskier, Chicago, IL
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:The Salomon Warden 11 with a 100mm brake will match your skill level and the performance of these skis. There is also a teal color available that would look rad on them.
Answered : Mar 01, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: looking for a versatile ski for my wife who is 5'7" approx. 130 lbs advanced skier but we ski almost exclusively at Mad River on ungroomed natural snow so LOTS of bumps at moderate speed. What length do you recommend in this ski, and does it perform well when being turned at moderate speeds?
Asked : Feb 18, 2017
By : glenskier, Boston, mA
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:The construction of all of the QST skis makes them very easy to ski at full throttle, slow speeds, and anything in between. Based on her weight, aggressiveness and ability I would recommend the 161cm. The 92 is one of the best bump skis out there for women while being very strong everywhere on the mountain. Ski it if you can!
Answered : Feb 20, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: I am looking at Lux 92 for skiing. I am 5'3' and 140lb and I like to ski in intermediate runs through the trees, bumps at intermediate and advanced intermediate. I Can ski blacks runs with bumps if not huge ones, but I don't do a lot of groomers much, but like the quick turn of the lux 92 through trees and bumps.Love powder as well.I tried these skis and loved turning radius, but a little soft on groomers. I was wondering whether to get the 153 or 161.
Asked : Feb 05, 2017
By : Ilene, United States
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:Based on your weight, ability and preferred terrain the 153cm will be the optimal size for you.
Answered : Feb 06, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: I demo skied a 161cm of these yesterday and loved them, with the exception of them being a little unstable on the straights at high speed. I'm an intermediate-advanced female skier, 5'8", 136lbs. I'm wondering if I should spring for the 169cm (would that add the stability I want or would it take away the fun carving, turning ability that I loved about them?). Mostly skiing in the Pacific Northwest. Thank you!
Asked : Jan 30, 2017
By : SeattleSkiGirl, Seattle, WA
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:Based on your weight and ability the 161cm seems like the optimal size for you. You may want to consider stepping up to the QST Lumin 99 for some extra floatation in the PNW.
Answered : Jan 31, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: I am 5'5" and 127lbs skiing intermediate to advanced. Wanting a stable ski where I feel control in variable conditions including hard pack. I have been skiing for 50 years and I am about to be 65. Want to feel stable, in control on a variety of conditions and have fun. Is this the ski for me and what length would be best?
Asked : Jan 24, 2017
By : Carol, San Diego
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:This would make a great option for you. It is most likely lighter and wider than what you may currently be skiing on. A wider and lighter ski will be less fatiguing for you, and be easier to ride in challenging conditions. Based on your age, weight and ability the 153cm will be the optimal size for you.
Answered : Jan 24, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: Hi! I am 5'2", 140 lbs, I typically ski in the trees in the Sierras. I have a 153 in a pair of all mountain pair of ski's. Should I be a 153 in these wide guys?
Asked : Jan 23, 2017
By : SALLY, Lake Tahoe, California
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:The 153cm will be the optimal size for you based on your weight and ability.
Answered : Jan 24, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: Hi, I am an advance- intermediate skier and 5'4 & 136 pounds. Stay on the front side of the mountain for the most part and have an average style- not too aggressive or cautious. I am struggling to determine if the 161 or 153 would suit me best.
Asked : Jan 04, 2017
By : Daniela, Chile
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:Based on your weight, ability, aggressiveness and the terrain you ski, the 153cm will be the optimal size for you.
Answered : Jan 05, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
 
You are using a web browser we don't support. Please use the latest version of one of these browsers
 
Don’t Miss Out!
Get exclusive email sneak peeks and the latest on upcoming sales, exclusive offers and events. Plus we’ll throw in a special perk, just for signing up.*