Home / Ski / Skis

K2 Marksman Skis 2017

$479.96
$799.95 (40% off)
K2 Marksman Skis 2017, , 600
IMAGE ZOOM VIEWER CONTROLS
  • Click to zoom in or click zoom in
  • Double click to zoom out or click zoom out
  • Click reset to reset image
360 SPIN VIEWER CONTROLS
  • Click and drag with rotate to rotate
  • Double click to zoom in or click zoom in
  • Double click to zoom out or click zoom out
  • Click reset to reset
  • Photos
$479.96
$799.95 (40% off)
Adventure Points Rewards Members earn 480 points with this purchase
This item is currently out of stock
This model is no longer available.
Sku#: 434135P
Overview

Best Use: All Mountain Wide skis are one-quiver for on/off-trail

All Mountain Wide skis are one-quiver for on/off-trail

Width: Wide - ideal for big mountain, off-trail and deep powder

Wide - ideal for big mountain, off-trail and deep powder

Flex: Medium - the casual skier with athletic ability

Medium - the casual skier with athletic ability

Rocker Profile: Rocker/Camber/Rocker skis for versatile all-mountain

Rocker/Camber/Rocker skis for versatile all-mountain

 

If you are seeking an all-mountain ski with a freestyle feel, you better have the new K2 Marksman in your sights. The Marksman is the newest creation from pro skier Pep Fujas to be his every day ski as he rules Little Cottonwood Canyon. An Asymmetrical Tip and Tail allows you to make insane butters at you launch off of something large. A shorter outside edges have a very smearable feeling in the super deep. The Double Barrel Construction has a denser core over the edges made from fir, and a lighter, softer center made from aspen, for a lower swingweight that makes the Marksman highly maneuverable. The 106mm waist feels much wider when the conditions are blower, but is easily carvable when the snow is firm and crunchy. A heavily rockered tip and tail only add to the playfulness and powder skiing prowess.


  • Asymmetrical Tip and Tail
  • Double Barrel
  • TwinTech Sidewalls
  • Recommended Bindings: Tyrolia Attack 13, Salomon STH WTR 13, Look SPX 12, Marker Griffon
  • Recommended Brake Size 110-115mm



Shipping Restriction: This item is not available for shipment outside of the United States.


Skill Range: AdvancedIntermediate-Expert

 

Specifications
Ski Gear Intended Use All Mountain Bindings Included No Tip/Waist/Tail Widths 130/106/125 (@177cm)
Tail Profile Twin Actual Turn Radius @ Specified Length 20m (@184cm) Construction Type Sidewall
Core Material Wood Used No Metal Layer None
Warranty One Year Skill Range AdvancedIntermediate-Expert Model Year 2017
Model Number S160301701170 Product ID 434135 Shipping Restriction This item is not available for shipment outside of the United States.
Recommended Items
Reviews

Average Rating

(4.7 out of 5) 4.7 3
download image
5.0  Star
 2
4.5  Star
 0
4.0  Star
 1
3.5  Star
 0
3.0  Star
 0
2.5  Star
 0
2.0  Star
 0
1.5  Star
 0
1.0  Star
 0
0.5  Star
 0
Displaying reviews 1-3
From : Skis.com
Date :
PROS
CONS
BEST USES

5.0
Comments:
Hi I'm Jeff, I just got off the K2 Marksman. I give this ski 5 out of 5 stars. Just a super, solid, fun ride. It's really for your advanced to expert skier. With the asymmetrical tip and tail it just comes in and out of turns really well and it gives you that nice poppy feeling from turn to turn; so i give it 5 out of 5 stars.
 
WAS THIS A GIFT? : 
 
BOTTOM LINE : 
 
Was this review helpful? : Yes  (0/ No  (0)
 

From : Skis.com
Date :
PROS
CONS
BEST USES

4.0
Comments:
Hey I'm Josh. I just got off the Marksman by K2. I give this ski 4 out of 5 stars. This is a new offering from K2 this year; 106 underfoot and a healthy amount of rocker in the tip and the tail. As far as cool new shapes go, there is a right and left ski to this; it's an asymmetrical shape in the tip and the tail so your outside edge is actually shorter than your inside edge. Definitely helps with turn initiation if you're buttering in powder or crud snow, it helps you get over a little bit faster and get to switch, then get back to going forward. As far as this ski goes it's the definition of an all-mountain ski. With the rocker tip and tail, 106 underfoot you can ski this ski anywhere. It was a little bit chattery on hard pack, but if you're in crud, mixed snow or some powder this would be an awesome ski for you. 4 out of 5 stars.
 
WAS THIS A GIFT? : 
 
BOTTOM LINE : 
 
Was this review helpful? : Yes  (0/ No  (0)
 

From : Skis.com
Date :
PROS
CONS
BEST USES

5.0
Comments:
Hi I'm Jon, I just got off the K2 Marksman. I give this ski a 5 out of 5 stars. This ski is new for this year, it has an asymmetrical tip and tail, which makes getting in and out of a turn very well. This ski is meant for an advanced expert rider looking for that one ski to do all-mountain powder. It's a great ski gone and get it.
 
WAS THIS A GIFT? : 
 
BOTTOM LINE : 
 
Was this review helpful? : Yes  (0/ No  (0)
 

Questions & Answers
Sort By :
Questions
Displaying questions 1-9
 
Q: I am 5'11", weight 70kg, 20 yrs old and am an advanced skier. However, the 177 seems to short and the 184 seems to long. Which size do you think would be the best?
Asked : Mar 28, 2017
By : Fergus, Edinburgh, UK
Know the answer? Answer this question
Not yet answered
 
Q: How do you think these would do with telemark setup (75mm 22designs vice/axel)?
Asked : Feb 02, 2017
By : tntran1986, loveland, co
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:Not being a tele guy, I could not speak for sure. With the flex pattern, rocker profile and shape I think that the Marksman would do pretty well. It is a pretty versatile ride that feels stiff, but not too stiff.
Answered : Feb 02, 2017
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: I am 5'8" in height and weigh 190 lbs. Am able to ski all terrain on the mountain and am an advanced skier. What Length K2 Marksman would you suggest?
Asked : Dec 27, 2016
By : Wes, Red Deer Alberta
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:At your height and weight you are caught right in between sizes, the decision comes down to how you want the ski to behave. If you are looking for a directional all mountain ripper that is going to be stable and speeds the 184 is the best choice. If you are looking for playful or freestyle feel the 177 would be better for you.
Answered : Dec 28, 2016
By : Thom
Q: Looking to get my husband skis. East coast expert skier that loves glades, doing jumps, bumps, etc. He's 6' 3" 175 lbs. I know he'd love the design/look of this ski and trying to get a sense if its right for him. He saw some Salomons that looked like wood and loved them and thinking these might be up his alley. Would you recommend? Or what else would you recommend? He does not want a traditional looking ski...he's also a snowboarder and appreciates good design :)
Asked : Dec 16, 2016
By : skiRI, Providence, RI
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:These a a fantastic ski for someone looking to explore the entire mountain on something that is both playful and powerful. The asymmetrical tip shape keeps the skis light, nimble, and easy to ski in soft snow, trees, etc. At his height and weight, with the rocker profile of this ski the 184cm would be a perfect length for him as well.
Answered : Dec 16, 2016
By : Thom
Q: I'm 6'0", 210 pounds, veteran, advanced skier, age 60. What length ski should I get?
Asked : Nov 11, 2016
By : Taoseno, Santa Fe, NM
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:Based on your weight, ability and location the 184cm would be the optimal size for you.
Answered : Nov 14, 2016
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: How would this ski rate in fresh, but heavy and wet ( California - crud) snow? Tony
Asked : Oct 16, 2016
By : Tony, Walnut Creek, Ca
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:I personally have not skied the Marksman in a heavy snowpack like in the Sierra, but I imagine it should do well. The asym tip and tail would be easier to maneuver without getting hung up or grabbing the snow. The rocker profile and wood core should provide ample flotation and stability.
Answered : Oct 17, 2016
By : Adam, Midwest
Q: What length would be recommended for me: I'm an advanced skier, 165 lbs, 5'8" ht.?
Asked : Aug 21, 2016
By : Tony, Walnut Creek, Ca
Know the answer? Answer this question
 
A:Based on your weight and ability the 170cm would be the best option for you.
Answered : Aug 22, 2016
By : Adam, Midwest
 
You are using a web browser we don't support. Please use the latest version of one of these browsers
 
Don’t Miss Out!
Get exclusive email sneak peeks and the latest on upcoming sales, exclusive offers and events. Plus we’ll throw in a special perk, just for signing up.*